Zum Hauptinhalt springen

Combining knowledge bases for system innovation in regions: Insights from an East German case study

Christoph Friedich and Daniel Feser

sofia Diskussionsbeiträge 2021, No. 8 https://doi.org/10.46850/sofia.9783941627956

This study aims to connect the literature strand on the geography of sustainability transitions with knowledge bases in regions. Thecontributions are threefold. First, the study investigates the recombination of knowledge bases in the regional knowledge transfer between academic and non-academic actors. This extends Strambach’s (2017) transnational approach to a regional level. Second, the study extends the empirical insights into universities, providing regionally relevant knowledge and accelerators for sustainability-oriented innovations that enable transformation processes (Pflitsch and Radinger-Peer 2018). Third, the case study presents exploratory insights with a dynamic perspective to examine the knowledge transfer of the EUSD and three affiliated regional intermediary organizations in the period between 1992, the year the Eberswalde University was founded, and 2020.

Access full article


  1. Asheim, B. 2007. Differentiated knowledge bases and varieties of regional in-novation system. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (3): 223–41. DOI:10.1080/13511610701722846.
  2. Asheim, B.. 2012. The Changing Role of Learning Regions in the Globalizing Knowledge Economy: A Theoretical Re-examination. Regional Studies 46 (8): 993–1004. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2011.607805.
  3. Asheim, B., Arne, I., Moodysson, J., and Markku, S. 2011. Knowledge bases, modes of innovation and regional innovation policy. A theoretical reex-amination with illustrations from the Nordic countries. In Beyond Terri-tory: Dynamic Geographies of Knowledge Creation and Innovation, ed. H. Bathelt, M. Feldman, and D. Koegler, 227–49. United Kingdom: Routledge.
  4. Asheim, B., Coenen, L., Moodysson, J., and Vang, J. 2007. Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innova-tion policy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 7 (2/3/4/5): 140–55. DOI: 10.1504/IJEIM.2007.012879.
  5. Asheim, B., and Gertler, M. S. 2005. The Geography of Innovations: Regional Innovationsystems. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, ed. J. Fager-berg, D. C. Mowery, and R. R. Nelson. 2nd ed., 291–317. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0011.
  6. Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., and Trippl, M. 2015. Regional Innovation Systems: Past - Presence - Future. Papers in Innovation Studies, Centre for Innova-tion, Research and Competence in the Learning Economy (CIRCLE), Lund University. Accessed January 22, 2020. www.re-searchgate.net/publication/282359791_Regional_Innovation_Sys-tems_Past_-_Presence_-_Future.
  7. Asheim, B., Grillitsch, M., and Trippl, M. 2017. Introduction. Combinatorial knowledge bases, regional innovation, and development dynamics. Eco-nomic Geography 93 (5): 429–35. DOI:10.1080/00130095.2017.1380775.
  8. Asheim, B., and Hansen, H. K. 2009. Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography 85 (4): 425–42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01051.x.
  9. Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., and Cooke, P. 2011. Constructing regional advantage. Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies 45 (7): 893–904. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2010.543126.
  10. Asheim, B. T., and Coenen, L. 2005. Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems. Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy 34 (8): 1173–90. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013.
  11. Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., and Vaismoradi, M. 2018. Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elab-oration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing 23 (1): 42–55. DOI:10.1177/1744987117741667.
  12. Azul, D. 2016. Gender-related aspects of transmasculine people's vocal situations: insights from a qualitative content analysis of interview transcripts. International journal of language & communication disorders 51 (6): 672–84. DOI:10.1111/1460-6984.12239.
  13. Bennat, T., and Sternberg, R. 2020. Knowledge bases in German regions. What hinders combinatorial knowledge dynamics and how regional in-novation policies may help. European Planning Studies 28 (2): 319–39. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2019.1656168.
  14. Binz, C., Coenen, L., Murphy, J. T., and Truffer, B. 2020. Geographies of transition. From topical concerns to theoretical engagement. A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34:1–3. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.002.
  15. Bohunovsky, L., Radinger-Peer, V., and Penker, M. 2020. Alliances of change pushing organizational transformation towards sustainability across 13 universities. Sustainability 12 (7): 2853. DOI:10.3390/su12072853.
  16. Borras, S., and Lundvall, B.-Å. 1997. The globalising learning economy. Implications for innovation policy. Unpublished manuscript, last modified January 20, 2020. http://www.globelicsacad-emy.org/2011_pdf/Lundvall%20Borras%201997.pdf.
  17. Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy. A review of research and theory. Research Policy 29 (4): 627–55. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1.
  18. Ceschin, F., and Gaziulusoy, I. 2016. Evolution of design for sustainability. From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies 47:118–63. DOI: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.
  19. Chen, Y., and Hassink, R. 2020. Multi-scalar knowledge bases for new regional industrial path development: toward a typology. European Plan-ning Studies 28 (12): 2489–2507. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2020.1724265.
  20. Cooke, P. 2004. Regional innovation systems: An evolutionary approach. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, ed. P. N. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, and H.-J. Braczyk. 2nd ed., 1–19. London: Routhlege.
  21. Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532. DOI:10.2307/258557.
  22. Fernandes, C., Farinha, L., Ferreira, J. J., Asheim, B., and Rutten, R. 2021. Regional innovation systems: what can we learn from 25 years of scientific achievements? Regional Studies 55 (3): 377–89. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1782878.
  23. Formica, P., Mets, T., and Varblane, U. 2008. Knowledge Transfer Mechanisms in the European Transition Economies. In Entrepreneurship and Higher Education, ed. J. Potter, M. J. Manimala, and J. Mitra, 289–311. Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED): OECD. DOI: 10.1787/9789264044104-15-en.
  24. Geels, F. W. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8-9): 1257–74. DOI:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
  25. Geels, F. W. 2004. Unterstanding system innovations: A critical literature review and a conceptual synthesis. In Elzen, Geels, and Green, System innova-tion and the transition to sustainability, 19–47.
  26. Geels, F. W. 2019. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39:187–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
  27. Geels, F. W., Elzen, B., and Green, K. 2004. General introduction: system i-novation and transitions to sustainability. In Elzen, Geels, and Green, System innovation and the transition to sustainability, 1–18.
  28. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., and Sorrell, S. 2017. The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions. Joule 1 (3): 463–79. DOI:10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018.
  29. Gertler, M. S. 2008. Buzz without being there? Communities of practice in context. In Community, Economic Creativity, and Organization, ed. A. Amin and J. Roberts, 203–26: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199545490.001.0001.
  30. Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J., and van Alstine, J. 2016. Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. WIREs Climate Change 7 (2): 251–65. DOI:10.1002/wcc.384. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.384.
  31. Grillitsch, M., Hansen, T., Coenen, L., Miörner, J., and Moodysson, J. 2019. Innovation policy for system-wide transformation. The case of strategic innovation programmes (SIPs) in Sweden. Research Policy 48 (4): 1048–61. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.004.
  32. Grillitsch, M., Martin, R., and Srholec, M. 2017. Knowledge Base Combina-tions and Innovation Performance in Swedish Regions. Economic Geog-raphy 93 (5): 458–79. DOI:10.1080/00130095.2016.1154442.
  33. Grillitsch, M., Schubert, T., and Srholec, M. 2019. Knowledge base combinations and firm growth. Research Policy 48 (1): 234–47. DOI:10.1016/j.re-spol.2018.08.009.
  34. Grundel, I., and Dahlström, M. 2016. A quadruple and quintuple helix approach to regional innovation systems in the transformation to a forestry-based bioeconomy. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 7 (4): 963–83. DOI:10.1007/s13132-016-0411-7.
  35. Gulbrandsen, M., Mowery, D., and Feldman, M. 2011. Introduction to the special section: Heterogeneity and university–industry relations. Re-search Policy 40 (1): 1–5. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.007.
  36. Hansen, T., and Coenen, L. 2015. The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 17:92–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001.
  37. Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Mason-D'Croz, D., Palmer, J., Bodirsky, B. L., Pradhan, P., Barrett, C. B. et al. 2021. Articulating the effect of food systems innovation on the Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet Planetary Health 5 (1): e50-e62. DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30277-1.
  38. Hirt, L. F., Sahakian, M., and Trutnevyte, E. 2021. What socio-technical regimes foster solar energy champions? Analysing uneven photovoltaic diffusion at a subnational level in Switzerland. Energy Research & Social Science 74:101976. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.101976.
  39. Hofman, P. S., Elzen, B. E., and Geels, F. W. 2004. Sociotechnical scenarios as a new policy tool to explore system innovations: Co-evolution of technology and society in the Netherland’s electricity domain. Innovation 6 (2): 344–60. DOI:10.5172/impp.2004.6.2.344.
  40. Howaldt, J., and Schwartz, M. 2010. Social Innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Studies for Innovation in a Modern Working Environment - International Monitoring 5.
  41. Howells, J. 2006. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Research Policy 35 (5): 715–28. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005.
  42. Jensen, M. B., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B. Å. 2007. Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy 36 (5): 680–93. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.006.
  43. Johnson, B., Lorenz, E., and Lundvall, B.-Å. 2002. Why all this fuss about codified and tacit knowledge? Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (2): 245–62. DOI:10.1093/icc/11.2.245.
  44. Kemp, R., Schot, J., and Hoogma, R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through porcesses of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2): 175–95. DOI:10.1080/09537329808524310.
  45. Klewitz, J., and Hansen, E. G. 2014. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production 65:57–75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.017.
  46. Kuckartz, U. 2018. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Methoden, Praxis, Computerun-terstützung. 4. Auflage. Grundlagentexte Methoden. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa. Accessed April 26, 2020.
  47. Kuckartz, U 2019. Qualitative Content Analysis: From Kracauer's Beginnings to Today's Challenges. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 20 (3): 1–20. DOI:10.17169/fqs-20.3.3370.
  48. Lawhon, M., and Murphy, J. T. 2012. Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions. Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 354–78. DOI:10.1177/0309132511427960.
  49. Lindberg, M., Danilda, I., and Torstensson, B.-M. 2012. Women resource centres. A creative knowledge environment of quadruple Helix. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 3 (1): 36–52. DOI:10.1007/s13132-011-0053-8.
  50. Loorbach, D., and Rotmans, J. 2010. The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42 (3): 237–46. DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.
  51. Lundvall, B., and Johnson, B. 1994. The learning economy. Journal of Industry Studies 1 (2): 23–42. DOI:10.1080/13662719400000002.
  52. Manniche, J. 2012. Combinatorial Knowledge Dynamics: On the Usefulness of the Differentiated Knowledge Bases Model. European Planning Studies 20 (11): 1823–41. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2012.723423.
  53. Manniche, J., and Testa, S. 2018. Towards a multi-levelled social process perspective on firm innovation: integrating micro, meso and macro concepts of knowledge creation. Industry and Innovation 25 (4): 365–88. DOI:10.1080/13662716.2017.1414746.
  54. Martin, R., and Moodysson, J. 2011a. Comparing knowledge bases. On the geography and organization of knowledge sourcing in the regional innovation system of Scania, Sweden. European Urban and Regional Stud-ies 20 (2): 170–87. DOI:10.1177/0969776411427326.
  55. Martin, R., and Moodysson, J.  2011b. Innovation in Symbolic Industries: The Geography and Organization of Knowledge Sourcing. European Planning Studies 19 (7): 1183–1203. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2011.573131.
  56. Mattes, J. 2012. Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies 46 (8): 1085–99. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2011.552493.
  57. Mayring, P. 2012. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Ein Beispiel für Mixed Methods. In Mixed methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung, ed. M. Gläser-Zikuda, T. Seidel, C. Rohlfs, A. Gröschner, and S. Ziegelbauer, 27–36. Münster: Waxmann.
  58. Mayring, P. 2015. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. 12th ed. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Verlag. Accessed March 17, 2020. www.beltz.de/fachmedien/sozialpaedagogik_soziale_arbeit/buecher/produkt_produktdetails/27650-qualitative_inhaltsanalyse.html.
  59. Mayring, P. 2016. Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. 6th ed. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Verlag. Accessed March 17, 2020. www.beltz.de/fachmedien/psychologie/buecher/produkt_produktdetails/27543-einfuehrung_in_die_qualitative_sozialforschung.html.
  60. Meadowcroft, J. 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 70–75. DOI:10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003.
  61. Moodysson, J., Coenen, L., and Asheim, B. 2008. Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 40 (5): 1040–56. DOI:10.1068/a39110.
  62. Müller, F. C., Brinks, V., Ibert, O., and Schmidt, S. 2015. Open Region. Working Paper No. 53.
  63. Muscio, A. 2007. The impact of absorptive capacity on SME's collaboration. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 16 (8): 653–68. DOI:10.1080/10438590600983994.
  64. Nonaka, I., and Takeuchi, H. 1995. The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York u. a. Oxford University Press. Accessed January 20, 2020. global.oup.com/academic/product/the-knowledge-creating-com-pany-9780195092691.
  65. Ockwell, D., Byrne, R., Hansen, U. E., Haselip, J., and Nygaard, I. 2018. The uptake and diffusion of solar power in Africa: Socio-cultural and political insights on a rapidly emerging socio-technical transition. Energy Research & Social Science 44:122–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.033.
  66. Paech, N. 2006. Directional certainty in sustainability-oriented innovation management. In Innovations Towards Sustainability. Vol. 84, ed. M. Lehmann-Waffenschmidt, 121–39. Sustainability and Innovation. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7908-1650-1_10.
  67. Papachristos, G. 2019. System dynamics modelling and simulation for sociotechnical transitions research. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31:248–61. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2018.10.001.
  68. Pflitsch, G., and Radinger-Peer, V. 2018. Developing boundary-spanning capacity for regional sustainability transitions. A comparative case study of the universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria). Sustainability 10 (4): 918. DOI:10.3390/su10040918.
  69. Pinto, H., and Fernández-Esquinas, M. 2018. What do stakeholders think about knowledge transfer offices? The perspective of firms and research groups in a regional innovation system. Industry and Innovation 25 (1): 25–52. DOI:10.1080/13662716.2016.1270820.
  70. Radinger-Peer, V., and Stoeglehner, G. 2013. Universities as change agents for sustainability. Framing the role of knowledge transfer and generation in regional development processes. Journal of Cleaner Production 44:85–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.003.
  71. Raven, R., Schot, J., and Berkhout, F. 2012. Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4:63–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001.
  72. Ridder, H.-G. 2017. The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research 10 (2): 281–305. DOI:10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z.
  73. Schneidewind, U., and Scheck, H. 2013. Die Stadt als „Reallabor“ für Systeminnovationen. In Soziale Innovation und Nachhaltigkeit, ed. J. Rückert-John, 229–48. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-18974-1_12.
  74. Schot, J., and Steinmueller, W. E. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy. R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–67. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011.
  75. Stephens, J. C., Hernandez, M. E., Román, M., Graham, A. C., and Scholz, R. W. 2008. Higher education as a change agent for sustainability in different cultures and contexts. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 9 (3): 317–38. DOI:10.1108/14676370810885916.
  76. Strambach, S. 2017. Combining knowledge bases in transnational sustainability innovation. microdynamics and institutional change. Economic Geography 93 (5): 500–526. DOI:10.1080/00130095.2017.1366268.
  77. Tödtling, F., and Grillitsch, M. 2015. Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? European Planning Studies 23 (9): 1741–58. DOI:10.1080/09654313.2015.1056773.
  78. Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2005. One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–19. DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018.
  79. Tödtling, F., and Trippl, M. 2016. How do firms acquire knowledge in different sectoral and regional contexts? In Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, ed. R. Shearmu, C. Carrincazeaux, and D. Doloreux, 142–54. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (Massachusetts, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing. Accessed March 07, 1992. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/ed-coll/9781784710767/9781784710767.00017.xml. DOI: 10.4337/9781784710774.00017.
  80. Truffer, B., and Coenen, L. 2012. Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21. DOI:10.1080/00343404.2012.646164.
  81. United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Unpublished manuscript, last modified February 19, 2020. sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transform-ingourworld/publication. A/RES/70/1.
  82. Xu, S. 2021. The paradox of the energy revolution in China: A socio-technical transition perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 137:110469. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110469.
  83. Yin, R. K. 2018. Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sixth edition. Los Angeles, London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: Sage.
  84. Yruela, M. P., and Fernández-Esquinas, M. 2015. Knowledge transfer in re-gional innovation systems. The effects of socioeconomic structures. In Resilient territories. inniovation and creativity for new modes of regional development, ed. H. Pinto. 1.th ed., 53–73. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.