Zum Hauptinhalt springen Skip to page footer

Knowledge transfer supporting sustainable development: implications for regional intermediaries

Simon J. Winkler-Portmann

sofia Diskussionsbeiträge 2021, No. 10 https://doi.org/10.46850/sofia.9783941627970

The wicked sustainability challenges of current socio-technical systems, crossing the planetary boundaries vital for human life, call for fundamental and radical change in the form of transitions. These sustainability transitions require a knowledge basis of relevant actors in the system, which intermediary structures organizing knowledge transfer can support. Over the last decades, sustainability researchers have not only increasingly studied the dynamics of transitions (Rip and Kemp 1998; Geels 2002; Papachristos et al. 2013), but have also gained insights on activities contributing to the acceleration of transitions and the sup-portive role of intermediaries in that regard (Wieczorek and Hekkert 2012; Kanda et al. 2018; Kivimaa et al. 2019). This paper revisits the literature on the dynamics of transitions, the activities of intermediaries in contributing in order to formulate implications of the characteristics of sustainable development and sustainability transitions and the related knowledge types for the organization of knowledge transfer by regional intermediaries.

Access full article


  1. Abson, D. J.; Wehrden, H. von; Baumgärtner, S.; Fischer, J.; Hanspach, J.; Härdtle, W. et al. (2014): Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. In Ecological Economics 103, pp. 29–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
  2. Abson, David J.; Fischer, Joern; Leventon, Julia; Newig, Jens; Schomerus, Thomas; Vilsmaier, Ulli et al. (2017): Leverage points for sustainability transformation. In Ambio 46 (1), pp. 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
  3. Beers, Pieter J.; van Mierlo, Barbara (2017): Reflexivity and Learning in System Innovation Processes. In Sociologia Ruralis 57 (3), pp. 415–436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12179.
  4. Blok, Vincent; Gremmen, Bart; Wesselink, Renate (2016): Dealing with the Wicked Problem of Sustainability in advance. In Business and Profes-sional Ethics Journal. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201621737.
  5. Carayannis, Elias G.; Barth, Thorsten D.; Campbell, David F. J. (2012): The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. In J Innov Entrep 1 (1), p. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-5372-1-2.
  6. Carayannis, Elias G.; Campbell, David F. J. (2019): Smart Quintuple Helix Inno-vation Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  7. Clayton, Anthony M. H.; Radcliffe, Nicholas J. (1996): Sustainability. A systems approach. Abingdon, Oxon: Earthscan.
  8. Clune, William Henry; Zehnder, Alexander J. B. (2020): The evolution of sus-tainability models, from descriptive, to strategic, to the three pillars framework for applied solutions. In Sustain Sci 15 (3), pp. 1001–1006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00776-8.
  9. Dentoni, Domenico; Blok, Vincent; Lans, Thomas; Wesselink, Renate (2012): Developing Human Capital for Agri-Food Firms’ Multi-Stakeholder In-teractions. In International Food and Agribusiness Management Re-view 15 (Special Issue A).
  10. Dovers, Stephen R.; Handmer, John W. (1992): Uncertainty, sustainability and change. In Global Environmental Change, pp. 262–276.
  11. Ehrenfeld, John (2008): Sustainability by design. A subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. New Haven Conn.: Yale Univ. Press. Available online at www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt1np8xc.
  12. Elder, Mark; Olsen, Simon Høiberg (2019): The Design of Environmental Priori-ties in the SDG s. In Glob Policy 10 (S1), pp. 70–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12596.
  13. Elzen, Boelie; Wieczorek, Anna J. (2005): Transitions towards sustainability through system innovation. In Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72 (6), pp. 651–661.
  14. Etzkowitz, Henry; Leydesdorff, Loet (2000): The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. In Research Policy 29 (2), pp. 109–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
  15. Fischer, Joern; Manning, Adrian D.; Steffen, Will; Rose, Deborah B.; Daniell, Katherine; Felton, Adam et al. (2007): Mind the sustainability gap. In Trends in ecology & evolution 22 (12), pp. 621–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.08.016.
  16. Florini, Ann; Pauli, Markus (2018): Collaborative governance for the Sustainable Development Goals. In Asia Pac Policy Stud 5 (3), pp. 583–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.252.
  17. Gaziulusoy, A. İdil (2015): A critical review of approaches available for design and innovation teams through the perspective of sustainability science and system innovation theories. In Journal of Cleaner Production 107, pp. 366–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.012.
  18. Gaziulusoy, A. İdil; Boyle, Carol; McDowall, Ron (2013): System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies. In Journal of Cleaner Production 45, pp. 104–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2012.05.013.
  19. Geels, Frank W. (2002): Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfigura-tion processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. In Research Policy 31, pp. 1257–1274.
  20. Geels, Frank W. (2005): The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). In Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 17 (4), pp. 445–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500357319.
  21. Geels, Frank W.; Elzen, Boelie; Green, Ken (2004): General Introduction: Sys-tem Innovation and Transitions to Sustainability. In Boelie Elzen, Frank W. Geels, Kenneth Green (Eds.): System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, evidence and policy. Cheltenham, U.K, North-ampton, Mass: Edward Elgar.
  22. Geels, Frank W.; Kemp, René (2007): Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Ty-pology of change processes and contrasting case studies. In Technol-ogy in Society 29 (4), pp. 441–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tech-soc.2007.08.009.
  23. Geels, Frank W.; Raven, Rob P.J.M. (2006): Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas De-velopment (1973–2003). In Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4), pp. 375–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777143.
  24. Geels, Frank W.; Schot, Johan (2007): Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. In Research Policy 36 (3), pp. 399–417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.re-spol.2007.01.003.
  25. Geels, Frank W.; Schot, Johan (2010): The Dynamics of Transitions. A Socio-Technical Perspective. In John Grin, Jan Rotmans, Johan Schot (Eds.): Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. First issued in paperback. New York, London: Routledge (Routledge studies in sustainability transitions, 1), pp. 9–101.
  26. Geels, Frank W.; Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Schwanen, Tim; Sorrell, Steve (2017): Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. In Science (New York, N.Y.) 357 (6357), pp. 1242–1244. DOI: https:/doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760.
  27. Giddings, Bob; Hopwood, Bill; O'Brien, Geoff (2002): Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. In Sust. Dev. 10 (4), pp. 187–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.199.
  28. Grin, John (2010): Understanding Transitions from a Governance Perspective. In John Grin, Jan Rotmans, Johan Schot (Eds.): Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transforma-tive change. First issued in paperback. New York, London: Routledge (Routledge studies in sustainability transitions, 1), pp. 221–319.
  29. Grin, John; Rotmans, Jan; Schot, Johan (2010): Introduction. From Persistent Problems to System Innovations and Transitions. In John Grin, Jan Rot-mans, Johan Schot (Eds.): Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. First issued in paperback. New York, London: Routledge (Routledge studies in sus-tainability transitions, 1), pp. 1–8.
  30. Grunwald, Armin (2004): Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. In IJFIP 1 (1/2), p. 150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004619.
  31. Hekkert, Marko P.; Janssen, Matthijs J.; Wesseling, Joeri H.; Negro, Simona O. (2020): Mission-oriented innovation systems. In Environmental Innova-tion and Societal Transitions 34, pp. 76–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.011.
  32. Heyen, Dirk Arne (2016): Exnovation: Herausforderungen und politische Ge-staltungsansätze für den Ausstieg aus nicht-nachhaltigen Strukturen. Edited by Öko-Institut. Berlin (Working Paper, 3/2016). Available online at www.oeko.de/fileadmin/oekodoc/WP-Exnovation.pdf, checked on 10/8/2020.
  33. Hirsch Hadorn, Gertrude; Schmied, Barbara; Frischknecht, Peter (2011): Transdisciplinary elements in university education: The case of the environ-mental science programme at ETH Zurich. In Claude Debru (Ed.): La transdisciplinarité. Comment explorer les nouvelles interfaces. Paris: Hermann (Visions des sciences), pp. 73–102.
  34. Hölscher, Katharina; Wittmayer, Julia M.; Loorbach, Derk (2018): Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27, pp. 1–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007.
  35. Hoogma, Remco (2002): Experimenting for sustainable transport. The approach of strategic niche management Remco Hoogma [and others]. London: Spon.
  36. IPCC (2018): Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the im-pacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, H.-O. Pörtner, D. Roberts, J. Skea, P. R. Shukla et al. Available online at www.ipcc.ch/sr15/, checked on 8/25/2020.
  37. Kanda, Wisdom; Hjelm, Olof; Clausen, Jens; Bienkowska, Dzamila (2018): Roles of intermediaries in supporting eco-innovation. In Journal of Cleaner Production 205, pp. 1006–1016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2018.09.132.
  38. Kanger, Laur; Schot, Johan (2019): Deep transitions: Theorizing the long-term patterns of socio-technical change. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 32, pp. 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.07.006.
  39. Kanning, Helga; Meyer, Christiane (2019): Verständnisse und Bedeutungen des Wissenstransfers für Forschung und Bildung im Kontext einer Großen Transformation. In Milad Abassiharofteh, Jessica Baier, Ange-lina Göb, Insa Thimm, Andreas Eberth, Falco Knaps et al. (Eds.): Räumliche Transformation. Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns. Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (Forschungsberichte der ARL, 10), pp. 9–28.
  40. Kemp, René; Rotmans, Jan; Loorbach, Derk (2007): Assessing the Dutch Energy Transition Policy: How Does it Deal with Dilemmas of Managing Transitions? In Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 9 (3-4), pp. 315–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622816.
  41. Kemp, René; Schot, Johan; Hoogma, Remco (1998): Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. In Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 10 (2), pp. 175–198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310.
  42. Kivimaa, Paula; Boon, Wouter; Hyysalo, Sampsa; Klerkx, Laurens (2019): Towards a typology of intermediaries in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and a research agenda. In Research Policy 48 (4), pp. 1062–1075. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.006.
  43. Köhler, Jonathan; Geels, Frank W.; Kern, Florian; Markard, Jochen; Wieczorek, Anna J.; Alkemade, Floortje et al. (2019): An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. In Environ-mental Innovation and Societal Transitions (31), pp. 1–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
  44. Lans, Thomas; Blok, Vincent; Wesselink, Renate (2014): Learning apart and to-gether: towards an integrated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship in higher education. In Journal of Cleaner Production 62, pp. 37–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.036.
  45. Loorbach, Derk; Rotmans, Jan (2006): Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. In Xander Olsthoorn, Anna J. Wieczorek (Eds.): Understanding Industrial Transformation. Views from Different Disciplines, vol. 44. Dordrecht: Springer (Environment & Policy, 44), pp. 187–206.
  46. Loorbach, Derk; Rotmans, Jan (2010): The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. In Futures 42 (3), pp. 237–246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009.
  47. Markard, Jochen; Raven, Rob P.J.M.; Truffer, Bernhard (2012): Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. In Re-search Policy 41 (6), pp. 955–967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
  48. Meppem, Tony; Gill, Roderic (1998): Planning for sustainability as a learning concept. In Ecological Economics 26, pp. 121–137.
  49. Michelsen, Gerd; Adomßent, Maik; Martens, Pim; van Hauff, Michael (2016): Sustainable Development – Background and Context. Chapter 2. In Harald Heinrichs, Pim Martens, Gerd Michelsen, Arnim Wiek (Eds.): Sustainability Science. An Introduction. 1st ed. 2016. Dordrecht, s.l.: Springer Netherlands, pp. 5–29.
  50. Nölting, Benjamin; Schäfer, Martina; Mann, Carsten; Koch, Eva (2012): Positionsbestimmungen zur Nachhaltigkeitsforschung am Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft – Einladung zur Diskussion. Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft. Berlin (discussion paper, 33/2012). Available online at www.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/f27/PDFs/Discussion_Papers/Nr._33_Discussionpaper_Bereich_Nachhaltigkeit_ueberab__0.pdf.
  51. Padilla, Luis Alberto (2019): Sustainability Evaluation. In : Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education: Springer, Cham, pp. 1661–1670. Available online at link.springer.com/referenceworken-try/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_76.
  52. Papachristos, George; Sofianos, Aristotelis; Adamides, Emmanuel (2013): System interactions in socio-technical transitions: Extending the multi-level perspective. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 7, pp. 53–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.03.002.
  53. Patterson, James; Schulz, Karsten; Vervoort, Joost; van der Hel, Sandra; Wi-erberg, Oscar; Adler, Carolina et al. (2017): Exploring the governance and politics of transformations towards sustainability. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24, pp. 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.001.
  54. Potts, Jason (2001): Knowledge and markets. In J Evol Econ 11 (4), pp. 413–431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00003865.
  55. ProClim (Ed.) (1997): Research on Sustainability and Global Change. Visions in Science Policy by Swiss Researchers. Bern. Available online at naturalsciences.ch/uuid/3df3d017-7928-56dd-864f-63904096048d, checked on 12/18/2019.
  56. Pyka, Andreas (2017): Dedicated innovation systems to support the transformation towards sustainability: creating income opportunities and employment in the knowledge-based digital bioeconomy. In J. open in-nov. 3 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0079-7.
  57. Rauter, Romana; Globocnik, Dietfried; Perl-Vorbach, Elke; Baumgartner, Rupert J. (2019): Open innovation and its effects on economic and sus-tainability innovation performance. In Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 4 (4), pp. 226–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.03.004.
  58. Raven, Rob P.J.M.; Schot, Johan; Berkhout, Frans (2012): Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 4, pp. 63–78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001.
  59. Raworth, Kate (2012): A Safe and Just Space for Humanity. Can We Live within the Doughnut? Oxfam (Oxfam Discussion Papers). Available online at www.oxfam.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/A-Safe-and-Just-Space-for-Humanity-Discussion-Paper-130212-en_2.pdf, checked on 12/4/2020.
  60. Raworth, Kate (2017): A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity's compass in the 21st century. In The Lancet Planetary Health 1 (2), e48-e49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1.
  61. Rieckmann, Marco (2012): Future-oriented higher education: Which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learn-ing? In Futures 44 (2), pp. 127–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fu-tures.2011.09.005.
  62. Rip, Arie; Kemp, René (1998): Technological change. In Steve Rayner, Eliza-beth L. Malone (Eds.): Human choice and climate change. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle Press, 327-399.
  63. Rockström, Johan; Steffen, Will; Noone, Kevin; Persson, Asa; Chapin, F. Stu-art; Lambin, Eric F. et al. (2009): A safe operating space for humanity. In Nature 461 (7263), pp. 472–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
  64. Rotmans, Jan; Kemp, René; van Asselt, Marjolein (2001): More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. In Foresight 3 (1), pp. 15–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003.
  65. Rotmans, Jan; Loorbach, Derk (2010): Towards a Better Understanding of Transitions and Their Governance. A Systemic and Refl exive Ap-proach. In John Grin, Jan Rotmans, Johan Schot (Eds.): Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. First issued in paperback. New York, London: Routledge (Routledge studies in sustainability transitions, 1), pp. 103–220.
  66. Sartorius, Christian (2006): Second-order sustainability—conditions for the de-velopment of sustainable innovations in a dynamic environment. In Ecological Economics 58 (2), pp. 268–286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.010.
  67. Schienstock, Gerd (2005): Sustainable Development and the Regional Dimen-sion of the Innovation System. In Matthias Weber, Jens Hemmelskamp (Eds.): Towards Environmental Innovation Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 97–113.
  68. Schlaile, Michael; Urmetzer, Sophie; Blok, Vincent; Andersen, Allan; Timmermans, Job; Mueller, Matthias et al. (2017): Innovation Systems for Transformations towards Sustainability? Taking the Normative Dimension Seriously. In Sustainability 9 (12). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122253.
  69. Schneidewind, Uwe (2013): Transformative Literacy. Gesellschaftliche Veränderungsprozesse verstehen und gestalten. In GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 22 (2), pp. 82–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.22.2.5.
  70. Schneidewind, Uwe (2014): Wandel verstehen - auf dem Weg zu einer "Transformative Literacy". In Harald Welzer, Klaus Wiegandt (Eds.): Wege aus der Wachstumsgesellschaft. 2. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch (Forum für Verantwortung, 19616), pp. 115–140.
  71. Schneidewind, Uwe (2018): Die große Transformation. Eine Einführung in die Kunst gesellschaftlichen Wandels. With assistance of Manfred Fischedick, Stefan Lechtenböhmer, Stefan Thomas. Originalausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch (Forum für Verantwortung, 70259).
  72. Scholz, Roland W. (2011): Environmental literacy in science and society. From knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  73. Schot, Johan (1998): The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. In History and Technology 14 (3), pp. 173–200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07341519808581928.
  74. Schot, Johan (2016): Confronting the Second Deep Transition through the Historical Imagination. In Technology and Culture 57 (2), pp. 445–456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2016.0044.
  75. Schot, Johan; Kanger, Laur (2018): Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality. In Research Policy 47 (6), pp. 1045–1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.009.
  76. Smith, Adrian; Stirling, Andy (2010): The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions. In E&S 15 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03218-150111.
  77. Smith, Adrian; Voß, Jan-Peter; Grin, John (2010): Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. In Research Policy 39 (4), pp. 435–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.re-spol.2010.01.023.
  78. Smith, Alastair M. (2019): Sustainable Development. In: Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education: Springer, Cham, pp. 1756–1766.
  79. Stiles, Jonathan (2020): Strategic niche management in transition pathways: Telework advocacy as groundwork for an incremental transformation. In Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 34, pp. 139–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.12.001.
  80. Stockholm Resilience Centre (2016): How food connects all the SDGs. Available online at stockholmresilience.org/research/research-news/2016-06-14-how-food-connects-all-the-sdgs.html, checked on 5/29/2020.
  81. United Nations (2015): Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/70/1). Available online at sustainable-development.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Develop-ment%20web.pdf, checked on 12/6/2019.
  82. Urmetzer, Sophie; Lask, Jan; Vargas-Carpintero, Ricardo; Pyka, Andreas (2020): Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy. In Ecological Economics 167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106435.
  83. Urmetzer, Sophie; Schlaile, Michael; Bogner, Kristina; Mueller, Matthias; Pyka, Andreas (2018): Exploring the Dedicated Knowledge Base of a Trans-formation towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy. In Sustainability 10 (6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061694.
  84. van den Bosch, S.J.M.; Brezet, J. C.; Vergragt, Ph.J. (2005): How to kick off system innovation: a Rotterdam case study of the transition to a fuel cell transport system. In Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (10-11), pp. 1027–1035.
  85. van Lente, Harro; Hekkert, Marko P.; Smits, Ruud; van Waveren, Bas (2003): Roles of Systemic Intermediaries in Transition Processes. In Int. J. Innov. Mgt. 07 (03), pp. 247–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919603000817.
  86. Veldkamp, A.; Altvorst, A. C.; Eweg, R.; Jacobsen, E.; Kleef, A.; Latesteijn, H. et al. (2009): Triggering transitions towards sustainable development of the Dutch agricultural sector: TransForum’s approach. In Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29 (1), pp. 87–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008022.
  87. Waas, Tom; Hugé, Jean; Verbruggen, Aviel; Wright, Tarah (2011): Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View. In Sustainability 3 (10), pp. 1637–1661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su3101637.
  88. WBGU (2011): World in transition. A social contract for sustainability. Flagship report. Berlin.
  89. Weber, Matthias; Truffer, Bernhard (1999): Experimenting with sustainable transport innovations. A workbook for strategic niche management. Seville / Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
  90. Wehrden, Henrik von; Luederitz, Christopher; Leventon, Julia; Russell, Sally (2017): Methodological Challenges in Sustainability Science: A Call for Method Plurality, Procedural Rigor and Longitudinal Research. In Challenges in Sustainability 5 (1), pp. 35–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12924/cis2017.05010035.
  91. Wieczorek, A. J.; Hekkert, M. P. (2012): Systemic instruments for systemic innovation problems: A framework for policy makers and innovation scholars. In Sci. and Pub. Pol. 39 (1), pp. 74–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scr008.
  92. Wiek, Arnim; Withycombe, Lauren; Redman, Charles L. (2011): Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. In Sustain Sci 6 (2), pp. 203–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0132-6.
  93. Wittmayer, Julia M.; Hölscher, Katharina (2017): Transformationsforschung. Definitionen, Ansätze, Methoden. Edited by Umweltbundesamt (Texte, 103/2017).
  94. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987): Our Common Future. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Devel-opment. Edited by United Nations (UN). New York.