Zum Hauptinhalt springen Skip to page footer

Portfoliodiversifikation: Der Einfluss von Herdenverhalten, Status-quo-Verzerrung und Spielerirrtum

Ibrahim Filiz, Thomas Nahmer, Markus Spiwoks and Kilian Bizer

sofia Diskussionsbeiträge 2017, No. 2 https://doi.org/10.46850/sofia.9783941627604

In dieser experimentellen Studie wird betrachtet, welchen Einfluss Herdenverhalten (Orientierung an der Mehrheit der Mitspieler oder Orientierung am erfolgreichsten Mitspieler (Guru), die Status-quo-Verzerrung und der Spielerirrtum auf das Diversifikationsverhalten haben. Dabei zeigt sich, dass weder Herdenverhalten noch Status-quo-Verzerrungen einen nennenswerten Beitrag zur Erklärung von nicht-optimalen Portfolioentscheidungen liefern. Der Spielerirrtum hingegen wird bei Portfolioentscheidungen wirksam. Viele Probanden bemühen sich, in der Historie von Zufallsereignissen Muster zu erkennen und Rückschlüsse auf künftige Zufallsereignisse zu ziehen. Der Spielerirrtum trägt wesentlich dazu bei, dass die optimale Portfoliozusammensetzung nur in 37,7% aller Entscheidungen Berücksichtigung findet.

Access full article


  1. Agnew, J., Balduzzi, P., Sundén, A., Portfolio choice and trading in a large 401(k) plan, The American Economic Review, 93(1), (2003), 193-215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455223.
  2. Anderson, A., Trading and Under-Diversification, Review of Finance, (2013), 1-43.
  3. Anderson, C. J., The Psychology of Doing Nothing: Forms of Decision Avoidance Result From Reason and Emotion, Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), (2003), 139-167. DOI: https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139.
  4. Auckenthaler, C., Theorie und Praxis des modernen Portfolio-Managements, Aufl., Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern, (1994).
  5. Ayton, P., Fischer, I., The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness?, Memory & Cognition, 32(8), (2004), 1369-1378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206327.
  6. Baltussen, G., Post, G. T., Irrational Diversification: An Examination of Individual Portfolio Choice, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(5), (2011), 1463-1491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002210901100041X.
  7. Barber, B. M., Odean, T., Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors, Journal of Finance, 55, 773-806. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00226.
  8. Barron, G., Leider, S., The Role of Experience in the Gambler’s Fallacy, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, (2010), 117-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.676.
  9. Belhoula, M., Naoui, K., Herding and positive feedback trading in American stock market: A two-directional behavior of investors, International Journal of Business and Management, 6, (2011), 244-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n9p244.
  10. Benartzi, S., Excessive extrapolation and the allocation of 401(k) accounts to company stock, The Journal of Finance, 56(5), (2001), 1747-1764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00388.
  11. Benartzi, S., Thaler, R. H., Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans, American Economic Review, 91(1), (2001), 79-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.79.
  12. Blume, M. E., Friend, I., The asset structure of individual portfolios and some implications for utility functions, The Journal of Finance, 30(2), (1975), 585-603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1975.tb01833.x.
  13. Bode, M., van Echelpoel, A., Sievi, C. R., Multinationale Diversifikation: Viel zitiert, kaum befolgt, Die Bank, 94(4), (1994), 202-206.
  14. Boyson, N. M., Implicit incentives and reputational herding by hedge fund managers, Journal of Empirical Finance, 17, (2010), 283-299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2009.10.005.
  15. Brown, A. L., Kagel, J. H., Behavior in a simplified stock market: the status quo bias, the disposition effect and the ostrich effect, Annals of Finance, 5, (2009), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10436-007-0092-0.
  16. Bryant, L. L., Evans, J., Bishara, J.: Status Quo Bias in the Mutual Fund Market: Consumer Inertia Amidst Benefitless Fee Increases, Banking and Finance Review, 1, (2012), 89-107.
  17. Chang, C. H., The Relationship between the Disposition Effect and Herding Behavior: Evidence from Taiwan`s Information Technology Stocks, International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 7(7), 2013, 1971-1975.
  18. Chang, E. C., Cheng, J. W., Khorana, A., An examination of herd behavior in equity markets: An international perspective, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, (2000), 1651-1679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00096-5.
  19. Charness, G., Gneezy, U., Imas, A., Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 87, (2013), 43-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023.
  20. Chen, D., Moskowitz, T. J., Shue, K., Decision-making under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers and Baseball Umpires, NBER Working Papers Series, Working Paper 22026, (2016). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w22026.
  21. Chen, Y., Wang, C., Lin, F., Do qualified foreign institutional investors herd in Taiwan’s securities market?, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 44, (2008), 62-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X440405.
  22. Chiang, T. C., Zheng, D., An empirical analysis of herd behavior in global stock markets, Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, (2010), 1911-1921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.12.014.
  23. Choe, H., Kho, B. C., Stulz, R. M., Do foreign investors destabilize stock markets? The Korean experience in 1997, Journal of Financial Economics, 54, (1999), 227-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00037-9.
  24. Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., Metrick, A., For Better or For Worse: Default Effects and 401(k) Savings Behavior, in: Wise, D.A., Perspectives in the Economics of Aging, University of Chicago Press, (2004), 81-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226903286.003.0003.
  25. Choi, S., Herding among local individual investors: Evidence from online and offline trading, Economics Letters, 144, (2016), 4-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.030.
  26. Christie, W. G., Huang, R. D., Following the pied piper: Do individual returns herd around the market? Financial Analysts Journal, 51, (1995), 31-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v51.n4.1918.
  27. Clotfelter, C. T., Cook, P. J., The "Gambler’s Fallacy" in Lottery play, NBER Working Papers Series, Working Paper 3769, (1991). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w3769.
  28. Crosetto, P., Filippin, A., The “bomb” risk elicitation task, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 47, (2013), 31-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-013-9170-z.
  29. Dimmock, S. G., Kouwenberg, R., Mitchell, O. S., Peijnenburg, K., Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 119, (2016), 559-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.01.003.
  30. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., Wagner, G. G., Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, Determinants, and behavioral consequences, Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), (2011), 522-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x.
  31. Duttle, K., Disentangling Two Causes of Biased Probability Judgment – Cognitive Skills and Perception of Biased Probability Judgment – Cognitive Skills and Perception of Randomness, Ruhr Economic Papers 568, (2015). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2706423.
  32. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis, 5. Aufl., Verlag John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, (1995).
  33. Ennis, R. M., Sebastian, M. D., A critical look at the case for hedge funds, Journal of Portfolio Management, 29, (2003), 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2003.319899.
  34. Eyster, E., Weizsäcker, G., Correlation Neglect in Financial Decision-Making, DIW Discussion Papers, No. 1104, Berlin (2011). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1735339.
  35. Fernandes, D., The 1/N Rule revisited: Heterogeneity in the naïve diversification bias, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(3), (2013), 310-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2013.04.001.
  36. Fischbacher, U., z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments, Experimental Economics, 10(2), (2007), 171–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4.
  37. Freiburg, M., Grichnik, D., Institutional Reinvestments in Private Equity Funds as a Double-Edged Sword: The Role of the Status Quo Bias, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, (2013), 134-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2013.791295.
  38. Galariotis, E. C., Rong, W., Spyrou, S. I., Herding on fundamental information: A comparative study, Journal of Banking & Finance, 50, (2015), 589-598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.03.014.
  39. Geng, S.: Decision time, Consideration time and Status Quo Bias, Economic Inquiry, 54(1), 2016, 433-449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12239.
  40. Goetzmann, W. N., Kumar, A., Equity portfolio diversification, Review of Finance, 12(3), (2008), 433-463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfn005.
  41. Gubaydullina, Z., Hein, O., Spiwoks, M., The status quo bias of bond market analysts, Journal of Applied Finance and Banking, 1(1), (2011), 31-51.
  42. Gubaydullina, Z., Spiwoks, M., Correlation neglect, naïve diversification, and irrelevant information as stumbling blocks for optimal diversification, Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 4(2), (2015), 1-19.
  43. Guiso, L., Haliassos, M., Japelli, T., Household Portfolios, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, (2002). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3568.001.0001.
  44. Hedesstrom, T. M., Svedsater, H., Garling, T., Covariation neglect among novice investors, Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied, 12(3), (2006), 155-165. DOI: https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1076-898X.12.3.155.
  45. Hein, O., Schwind, M., Spiwoks, M., Network Centrality and Stock Market Volatility: The Impact of Communication Topologies on Prices, in: Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 1(1), (2012), 199-232.
  46. Hein, O., Schwind, M., Spiwoks, M., Frankfurt Artificial Stock Market – A Micro¬scopic Stock Market Model with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents in Small-World Communication Networks, Journal of Economic Interaction and Co-ordination, 3(1), (2008), 59-71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-008-0036-4.
  47. Hibbert, A. M., Lawrence, E. R., Prakash, A. J., Can Diversification be Learned?, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13(1), (2012), 38-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2012.654547.
  48. Holt, C. A., Laury, S. K., Risk aversion and incentive effects, American Economic Review, 92(5), (2002), 1644-1655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802762024700.
  49. Huang, T. C., Wu, C. C., Lin, B. H., Institutional herding and risk-return relationship, Journal of Business Research, 69, (2016), 2073-2080. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.011.
  50. Huberman, G., Sengmueller, P., Performance and employer stock in 401(k) plans, Review of Finance, 8(3), (2004), 403-443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10679-004-2544-y.
  51. Inman, J. J., Zeelenberg, M., Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability, Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), (2002), 116-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/339925.
  52. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., The psychology of preference, Scientific American, 246, 160-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160.
  53. Kallir, I., Sonsino, D.: The Neglect of Correlation in Allocation Decisions, Southern Economic Journal, 75(4), (2009), 1045-1066.
  54. Kempf, A., Ruenzi, S., Status quo bias and the number of alternatives: An empirical illustration from the mutual fund industry, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 7, (2006), 204–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427579jpfm0704_3.
  55. Kim, W., Jegadeesh, N., Do analysts herd?, An analysis of recommendations and market reactions, Review of Financial Studies, 23, (2010), 901-937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhp093.
  56. Klemkosky, R. C., The impact and efficiency of institutional net trading imbalances, Journal of Finance, 32, (1977), 79-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03243.x.
  57. Kraus, A., Stoll, H. R., Parallel trading by institutional investors, Journal of Financial and quantitative Analysis, 7, (1972), 2107-2138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2329958.
  58. Kremer, S., Nautz, D., Causes and consequences of short-term institutional herding, Journal of Banking & Finance, 37, (2013), 1676-1686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.006.
  59. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. W., The Impact of Institutional Trading on Stock Prices, Journal of Financial Economics, 32, (1992), 23-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(92)90023-Q.
  60. Lawrence, E. R., Prakash, A. J., Can Diversification be Learned?, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13, (2012), 38-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2012.654547.
  61. Lease, R. C., Lewellen, W. G., Schlarbaum, G. G., The individual investor: Attributes and attitudes, The Journal of Finance, 29(2), (1974), 413-433. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03055.x.
  62. Lien, J. W., Yuan, J., The cross-sectional “Gambler’s Fallacy”: Set representativeness in lottery number choices, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 109, (2015), 163-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.10.011.
  63. Lin, W., T., Tsai, S.-C., Lung, P.-Y., Investors’ Herd Behavior: Rational or Irrational?, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 42, (2013), 755-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajfs.12030.
  64. Lönnqvist, J.-E., Verkasalo, M., Walkowitz, G., Wichardt, P. C., Measuring Individual risk attitudes in the lab: Task or ask? An empirical comparison, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 119, (2015), 254-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.08.003.
  65. Markose, S., Alentorn, A., Krause, A.: Dynamic Learning, Herding and Guru Effects in Networks, University of Essex, Economics Department, Working Paper No. 582, 2004.
  66. Markowitz, H., Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance, 7(1), (1952), 77-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x.
  67. Meulbroek, L., Company stock in pension plans: How costly is it?, The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2), (2005), 443-474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/430807.
  68. Morrin, M., Inman, J. J., Broniarczyk, S. M., Nenkov, G. Y., Reuter, J., Investing for Retirement: The Moderating Effect of Fund Assortment Size on the 1/N Heuristic, Journal of Marketing Research, 49(4), (2012), 537-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509%2Fjmr.08.0355.
  69. Nofsinger, J., Sias, R., Herding and feedback trading by institutional and individual investors, Journal of Finance, 54, (1999), 2263-2295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00188.
  70. Panchenko, V., Gerasymchuk, S., Pavlov, O., V., Asset Price Dynamics with Local Interactions under Heterogeneous Beliefs, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(12), (2013), 2623-2642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2013.06.015.
  71. Patel, J., Zeckhauser, R., Hendricks, D., The Rationality Struggle: Illustrations from Financial Markets, The American Economic Review, 81, (1991), 232–236.
  72. Polkovnichenko, V., Household portfolio diversification: A case for rankdependent preferences, Review of Financial Studies, 18, (2005), 1467-1502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi033.
  73. Powdthavee, N., Riyanto, Y. E., Why Do People Pay for Useless Advice? Implications of Gambler’s and Hot-Hand Fallacies in False-Expert Setting, IZA Discussion Paper 6557, (2012).
  74. Rieger, M. O., Why Do Investors Buy Bad Financial Products? Probability Misestimation and Preferences in financial Investment Decision, The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 13, (2012), 108-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427560.2012.680991.
  75. Samuelson, W., Zeckhauser, R.: Status Quo Bias in Decision Making, The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, (1988), 7-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00055564.
  76. Sias, R. W., Institutional Herding, Rewiew of Financial Studies, 17(1), (2004), 165-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhg035.
  77. Spiwoks, M., External Triggered Herding bei Rentenmarkt-Analysten, Finanzmarkt und Portfolio-Management, 18(1), (2004), 58-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-004-0105-1.
  78. Spiwoks, M., Bizer, K., Hein, O., Anchoring Near the Lighthouse: Bond Market Analysts’ Behavior Co-ordination by External Signal, in: European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 13, (2008), 169-191.
  79. Stöckl, T., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Lindner, F., Hot hand and gambler´s fallacy in teams: Evidence from investment experiments, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 117, (2015), 327-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.07.004.
  80. Suetens, S., Galbo-Joergensen, C., Tyran, J.-R., Predicting Lotto Numbers: Experiment on the Gambler´s Fallacy and the Hot-Hand Fallacy, Journal of the European Economic Association, 14(3), (2016), 584-607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12147.
  81. Tedeschi, G., Iori, G., Gallegati, M., Herding effects in order driven markets: The rise and fall of gurus, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81, (2012), 82-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.006.
  82. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, Science, 185, (1974), 1124–1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
  83. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., Belief in the law of small numbers, Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), (1971), 105–110. DOI: https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0031322.
  84. Voronkova, S., Bohl, M. T., Institutional traders’ behavior in an emerging stock market,: Empirical evidence on Polishpension fund investors, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32, (2005), 1537-1560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00639.x.
  85. Walter, A., Weber, F. M., Herding in the German mutual fund industry, European Financial Management, 12, (2006), 375-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00325.x.
  86. Weber, E.U., Siebenmorgen, N., Weber, M., Communication Asset Risk: How Name Recognition and the Format of Historic Volatility Information Affect Risk Perception and Investment Decisions, Risk Analysis, 25(3), (2005), 597-609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00627.x.
  87. Wermers, R., Mutual Fund Herding and the Impact on Stock Prices, Journal of Finance, 54, (1999), 581-622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00118.
  88. Yen, H. R., Chuang, S. C., The effect of incidental affect on preference for the status quo, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, (2008), 522-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0084-2.
  89. Zeelenberg, M., van den Bos, K., van Dijk, E., Pieters, R., The inaction effect in the psychology of regret, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 2002, 314-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.314.